top of page

Navigating the Ethical Maze: Quality Professionals Beyond the Role of Enforcers

Effective Communication to Preempt Operational Failures.

In the corridors of corporate domains, clashes over logistics and operational processes often ensnare managers in charged confrontations. Yet, amidst these tumultuous exchanges lies a more profound question: Should quality professionals solely bear the mantle of enforcement?


Scene: An Office in the Heart of a Busy Company


Manager 1: "Thanks for coming. I need to discuss your logistics process."

Manager 2: "Sure, what's the matter?"

Manager 1: "My team refuses to ship our product without the correct paperwork."

Manager 2: "My team will handle it, but we need the proper paperwork."

Manager 1: "You've used unauthorized transport companies!"

Manager 2: "That was an exceptional situation due to a supply-chain shortfall!"

Manager 1: "Possibly. Are you going to ship my product?"

Manager 2: "You're threatening me!"

Manager 1: "[dials number] Hello, quality audit department, I need an audit…"


The scenario between Manager 1 and Manager 2 may ring familiar to many quality professionals - a terse exchange pitting logistics protocols against operational exigencies. This commonplace interaction often escalates to a manager’s impassioned call to audit another department, a precursor to a potential nonconformity report (NCR). But is this a genuine concern for process improvement or a veiled retribution strategy?


The ethical quandary is apparent. Despite advocating a culture of learning from nonconformities, quality professionals find themselves at odds - caught between the noble pursuit of improvement and the role of a disciplinary enforcer. Evading this stance necessitates a paradigm shift in approach.


This underscores a critical strategy: steering clear of becoming the direct action owner in remedying nonconformities. Instead, effective communication stands as the beacon guiding operations. By preempting nonfulfillments through proactive engagement and fostering a culture where issues are addressed promptly, the need for formal NCRs or specialised audits diminishes.


The narrative of 'bullet loaders' is vital, emphasising the intricacies behind nonconformities. We need a shift from merely attributing nonfulfillments to a single incident, preferring comprehensive evaluations through representative sampling. This approach dissects supplier inputs, operational handovers, and the often-overlooked facets of process functionality.


The crux lies in conscientiously assigning corrective action owners, often different from the transgressors. Vaughan reminisces on a poignant incident where the 'bullet loader' assumed accountability - an ode to the poetic justice in such occurrences.


A final plea is one of clarification - a clarion call to engage proactively, not to circumvent NCRs or audits but to instil a deeper sense of awareness. It's a call for stakeholders to embrace dialogue, defuse potential conflicts, and avert nonfulfillments before they demand the intervention of quality professionals.


In the realm of quality management, these insights propose a fundamental shift: from punitive enforcement to proactive communication - a beacon illuminating a path towards a harmonious, more effective operational landscape.


A message from our sponsors, AAA Certification:


If you would like to get a quote for ISO Certification, then simply contact us.


Or, if you want to see what's involved in more detail, then get a completely free, no obligation, totally tailored ISO Gap Analysis for your business (only available to UK businesses).

8 views0 comments

Comments


MainLogo.png
Sponsored by:
bottom of page